The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has agreed to pay $303 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by thousands of current and former unpaid college coaches who claimed that the association and its member schools violated federal antitrust laws. The proposed agreement, filed in federal court, represents another major step in the ongoing transformation of the NCAA’s policies regarding compensation in college sports.
Allegations and Background of the Case
The lawsuit centered on the NCAA’s long-standing restrictions that prohibited universities from paying certain volunteer coaches in sports other than baseball. Plaintiffs argued that this rule effectively suppressed wages and restricted fair competition among schools for qualified coaching talent.
The case covered thousands of Division I volunteer coaches who worked between March 2019 and June 2023, a period during which they were barred from receiving pay for their contributions. These coaches performed many of the same responsibilities as paid staff—running practices, analyzing game footage, assisting in recruiting, and providing strategic guidance—yet were officially labeled as “volunteers,” preventing them from earning compensation.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs alleged that this unpaid structure created an illegal wage-fixing arrangement, violating U.S. antitrust law by eliminating the market for coaching labor. The NCAA and its members, they argued, conspired to maintain a system that benefited universities financially while denying fair compensation to those doing the work.
Settlement Terms and Distribution
If approved, the $303 million settlement would provide direct payments to over 7,700 coaches who qualified under the class definition. According to the court filings, no coach would receive less than $5,000, and the average payout before attorney fees would be approximately $39,260. Some claimants—especially those who served longer or at higher-profile programs—may receive six-figure settlements.
The proposed agreement would also include attorneys’ fees and administrative costs, which will be reviewed and approved by the court. The plaintiffs’ lawyers praised the deal as “a historic and fair resolution that provides meaningful compensation to thousands of hardworking coaches who contributed significantly to college athletics.”
NCAA’s Response and Denial of Wrongdoing
While agreeing to the settlement, the NCAA has denied any wrongdoing. In its official statement, the organization emphasized that the decision to settle was made to bring “certainty and clarity” to both the association and its member schools.
The NCAA stated that “although the association continues to believe its policies were lawful and reasonable, resolving this litigation allows the NCAA to move forward while focusing on supporting college athletes and improving the collegiate sports experience.”
Notably, the NCAA abolished the volunteer coach compensation restriction in 2023, effectively acknowledging the shifting landscape in collegiate athletics and growing legal scrutiny of unpaid labor practices.
Legal Proceedings and Court Review
The proposed settlement will now undergo judicial review. U.S. District Judge William Shubb is expected to conduct a preliminary approval hearing in December 2025, with a final fairness hearing tentatively scheduled for early 2026. If approved, the payments could begin as soon as mid-2026 after administrative processing and claims verification.
This case highlights the increasing number of legal challenges against the NCAA’s amateurism and labor compensation policies—issues that have already led to sweeping changes in how college athletes and staff are compensated.
Broader Context: NCAA’s Shifting Legal Landscape
The settlement comes amid a wave of similar litigation questioning the NCAA’s control over compensation in college sports. Earlier this year, the organization reached a proposed $2.8 billion settlement in a separate case that would allow universities to begin paying student-athletes directly for the first time. That deal, however, is currently under review by a federal appeals court.
Legal experts say the unpaid coaches’ case is a natural extension of these broader challenges. “The legal trend is clear,” said one sports law professor. “The NCAA’s historic model of restricting pay under the guise of amateurism is collapsing under modern labor and antitrust scrutiny.”
If finalized, the $303 million settlement will set a significant precedent for how non-athlete participants—such as assistant and volunteer coaches—can challenge wage restrictions in college athletics.
Implications for Colleges and Coaches
The implications of this settlement extend beyond financial compensation. It forces universities to reconsider the ethics and legality of relying on unpaid or underpaid labor to support multimillion-dollar athletic programs.
For the coaches involved, many of whom dedicated years to developing student-athletes, the payout represents a long-awaited acknowledgment of their contributions. “These coaches were doing the same work as paid assistants—scouting, recruiting, and managing practices—but for zero pay,” said one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs. “This settlement helps correct a systemic injustice.”
Colleges are now expected to review internal policies regarding staffing and compensation to ensure compliance with antitrust and labor laws. Many institutions have already started transitioning former “volunteer” roles into paid assistant coaching positions following the NCAA’s 2023 policy change.
Looking Ahead
The NCAA’s decision to settle underscores a broader reality: the legal and public pressure for reform within college athletics is intensifying. From the landmark Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) changes to expanding compensation rights for both athletes and staff, the organization is being forced to adapt rapidly to modern legal and ethical standards.
As the settlement moves toward approval, it marks another significant moment in the NCAA’s ongoing evolution from a tightly regulated amateur model toward a more transparent and equitable compensation system.
💼 Thinking About a Career in Sports Law or Employment Litigation?
This landmark NCAA settlement highlights the growing demand for attorneys who understand labor rights and compensation disputes. If you’re looking to advance your legal career in sports, antitrust, or employment law, explore exclusive job openings and career resources on LawCrossing.com — the premier job site for legal professionals.
👉 Find your next legal opportunity today on LawCrossing!