Elon Musk’s social media company, X (formerly known as Twitter), has reached a settlement in a high-profile legal battle with four of Twitter’s former top executives over more than $128 million in disputed severance pay. The case, filed earlier this year in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, had drawn widespread attention for its claims of wrongful termination, breach of contract, and bad-faith conduct following Musk’s $44 billion acquisition of the platform in 2022.
The plaintiffs—Parag Agrawal (former CEO), Ned Segal (former CFO), Vijaya Gadde (former Chief Legal Officer), and Sean Edgett (former General Counsel)—alleged that Musk deliberately avoided paying them severance by firing them “for cause” immediately after the takeover. According to their lawsuit, Musk accused them of misconduct without any legitimate justification, in what they described as a “scheme” to sidestep Twitter’s contractual obligations.
Under Twitter’s pre-acquisition agreements, the executives were collectively entitled to substantial severance packages that included salary continuations, bonuses, and accelerated stock options. The total value of those packages reportedly exceeded $128 million. Musk’s legal team countered that the executives were terminated for valid reasons tied to alleged mismanagement and poor performance before the sale was completed.
Court filings show that earlier this month, both sides notified Judge Vince Chhabria that they had reached a settlement, prompting the court to suspend upcoming deadlines while the agreement is finalized. The specific terms of the settlement remain confidential, but the resolution brings an end to one of the most prominent legal disputes surrounding Musk’s tumultuous takeover of Twitter.
A Tumultuous Transition
Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in October 2022 was marked by dramatic and immediate changes. Within days of closing the deal, he dismissed several top executives and initiated mass layoffs affecting thousands of employees worldwide. His leadership style—characterized by sweeping restructuring, policy reversals, and a rebranding of the company to “X”—sparked controversy and numerous legal challenges.
The four former executives claimed they were treated unfairly during this transition. Their lawsuit alleged that Musk “made up fake justifications” for their termination to avoid paying legally mandated severance and accused him of violating California’s labor and contract laws. “Musk’s refusal to pay what was owed wasn’t just petty—it was unlawful,” their legal team stated in court documents.
Musk’s representatives, however, maintained that the executives failed to act in the company’s best interests and that the “for cause” terminations were justified. While the settlement allows both parties to move forward without further litigation, it underscores the deep divisions and chaotic aftermath that followed Musk’s acquisition of the social media platform.
A Broader Pattern of Legal Disputes
The severance dispute with Agrawal, Segal, Gadde, and Edgett is just one of several legal challenges Musk’s X has faced since the takeover. In August 2025, X settled a separate class-action lawsuit involving thousands of former employees who sought roughly $500 million in unpaid severance benefits following mass layoffs.
Those plaintiffs, like the former executives, accused Musk of deliberately restructuring the company to avoid honoring pre-existing employment contracts and severance obligations. While the company has denied wrongdoing in each case, the growing list of settlements indicates that Musk’s aggressive cost-cutting measures have come at significant legal expense.
Additionally, X Corp. continues to face lawsuits over unpaid vendor fees, office rent, and former contractors’ claims—further illustrating the financial and operational challenges that have accompanied the company’s transition under Musk’s ownership.
The Road Ahead for X
Since being rebranded as X in 2023, the platform has undergone sweeping changes in its business model and user experience. Musk has positioned X as an “everything app,” integrating social media, financial services, and communications under one umbrella. Despite this ambitious vision, the company has faced declining ad revenues, increased competition, and legal scrutiny over its business practices.
The settlement with Twitter’s former executives could help Musk refocus attention on rebuilding the company’s reputation and stabilizing its operations. However, with multiple ongoing disputes and a still-evolving regulatory landscape for tech companies, X remains under the legal microscope.
A Cautionary Tale for Corporate Governance
The X settlement highlights critical questions about corporate governance, executive compensation, and contractual obligations during mergers and acquisitions. Legal experts have pointed to the case as a cautionary example of how abrupt leadership changes and aggressive post-acquisition tactics can lead to significant legal exposure.
“Regardless of ownership changes, contractual severance agreements are binding,” noted one employment law analyst. “Attempting to circumvent those obligations, especially for senior executives, often leads to costly settlements or reputational damage.”
While details of the resolution remain private, the settlement closes another chapter in Musk’s ongoing efforts to streamline X’s operations. It also reflects a growing trend among tech companies toward resolving high-stakes disputes quietly to avoid prolonged public litigation.
Conclusion
Elon Musk’s decision to settle the $128 million severance lawsuit marks a significant milestone in his two-year effort to reshape Twitter into X. The agreement, though confidential, signals a desire by both parties to move on from one of the most contentious employment disputes in Silicon Valley history.
As X continues its transformation into a multipurpose digital platform, Musk’s handling of legacy liabilities—including employment contracts and severance claims—will remain a focal point for regulators, investors, and the broader tech community.
Stay informed on the latest in corporate law, tech industry litigation, and employment disputes by visiting JDJournal. For attorneys exploring new career opportunities in leading tech and media firms, explore exclusive listings on LawCrossing today.